[missing-sync-winmobile-talk] Re: missing-sync-winmobile-talk
Digest, Vol 36, Issue 14
pws2000 at gmx.net
pws2000 at gmx.net
Mon Jan 16 16:13:42 PST 2006
Ed,
nobody is going to deny that you may have your own opinion about the
state of things, but I think we all agree that one should consider
phasing them in a matter appropriate to a public forum. Everything
else just projects a sore lack of sophistication.
Peter
On 17.01.2006, at 0:38 am, Ed . wrote:
> You would think that soon would be in the coming year or 6 months.
> The crap
> they took for coming out with the last one was because when you hype
> something up and you under produce, you tend to get crap. Yeah,
> granted WM5
> is completely different and the original method of syncing is gone
> [I know
> this stuff I've been looking into it for a long time and MS seemed
> to most
> promising], I still think it is still very unfair to call it soon,
> when oh
> say, you don't even know when you're going have it, or there's no
> beta, or
> you probably have just about nil. When a doctor tells you that you've
> contracted a terminal illness, and you're going to die soon, you'd
> probably
> like to know when. This may not be as serious as that, but I still
> think
> when you make a claim, you should at least have something
> substantial or
> else you get bs flying around [sounds like the US patent system].
> And no
> need to drop an f' bomb. Perhaps you're right and if you are, I'm
> sorry. But
> I think there is a perfectly valid place for that, because usually,
> when
> people get raped, they yell rape. When there's a fire, they yell
> fire. So
> natural response, when I got f'ed. I'm gonna say it =D. If you're
> willing to
> continue this attempt to lecture me, feel free to email me personally
> instead of the whole list, I would rather not spam everyone. I do have
> manners/class, and when I use those words I have good reason.
>
More information about the missing-sync-winmobile-talk
mailing list