[missing-sync-winmobile-talk] Re: missing-sync-winmobile-talk Digest, Vol 36, Issue 14

pws2000 at gmx.net pws2000 at gmx.net
Mon Jan 16 16:13:42 PST 2006


Ed,

nobody is going to deny that you may have your own opinion about the  
state of things, but I think we all agree that one should consider  
phasing them in a matter appropriate to a public forum. Everything  
else just projects a sore lack of sophistication.

Peter

On 17.01.2006, at 0:38 am, Ed . wrote:

> You would think that soon would be in the coming year or 6 months.  
> The crap
> they took for coming out with the last one was because when you hype
> something up and you under produce, you tend to get crap. Yeah,  
> granted WM5
> is completely different and the original method of syncing is gone  
> [I know
> this stuff I've been looking into it for a long time and MS seemed  
> to most
> promising], I still think it is still very unfair to call it soon,  
> when oh
> say, you don't even know when you're going have it, or there's no  
> beta, or
> you probably have just about nil. When a doctor tells you that you've
> contracted a terminal illness, and you're going to die soon, you'd  
> probably
> like to know when. This may not be as serious as that, but I still  
> think
> when you make a claim, you should at least have something  
> substantial or
> else you get bs flying around [sounds like the US patent system].  
> And no
> need to drop an f' bomb. Perhaps you're right and if you are, I'm  
> sorry. But
> I think there is a perfectly valid place for that, because usually,  
> when
> people get raped, they yell rape. When there's a fire, they yell  
> fire. So
> natural response, when I got f'ed. I'm gonna say it =D. If you're  
> willing to
> continue this attempt to lecture me, feel free to email me personally
> instead of the whole list, I would rather not spam everyone. I do have
> manners/class, and when I use those words I have good reason.
>


More information about the missing-sync-winmobile-talk mailing list