[missing-sync-pocketpc-talk] disappointment

[Seth D. Palmer]

Please - this should not discussed on this list.

On Thursday, Jun 5, 2003, at 10:41 America/New_York, Mark Srebnik wrote:

> Hi Jeri,
>
> Can't believe that anyone wouldn't want  to use OSX 10.2 or higher!
>
> There are lots of improvements across the boards. Each update gets 
> better
> and better, faster and more stable. Maybe you're not interested in 
> some of
> the other enhancements but trust me you won't regret getting Jaquar....
>
> I'm running OSX 10.2.6 now and have gone through all the updates with 
> no
> problems either on my old beigeG3(w/G4) or my Gigabit Ethernet G4 Mac.
>
> Anyway, just my 2¢....
>
> Mark
>
>
> on 6/5/03 6:36 AM, jerib at jerib at lexusofaustin.com wrote:
>
>> I've been a member of this list for several months now under a 
>> different
>> email address that I cannot use on my work LAN (that's the reason for 
>> this
>> new one).  Anyway, in all that time I've been under the impression 
>> that
>> Missing-Sync was for OS X, period.  Now it comes to light we must 
>> have OS X
>> 10.2 or higher.  Anything for those of us who have no use for the 
>> $130 worth
>> of "enhancements" of 10.2?
>>
>> Jeri B
>
> _______________________________________________
> missing-sync-pocketpc-talk mailing list
> missing-sync-pocketpc-talk at lists.markspace.com
> Unsubcribing information, subscription options and list archives can 
> be found at:
> http://lists.markspace.com/mailman/listinfo/missing-sync-pocketpc-talk
>