[missing-sync-pocketpc-talk] disappointment

[Derek Jones]

This is kind of off topic, but 10.2 is superior in every conceivable way to
any < 10.2 installation.  I held on to 10.1 for a loooong time on both my
work and home computers, and the IS department updated my work computer
off-hours.  I was mad at first, but after a week of use, I upgraded at home
as well.  I should add that my home mac is a 500MHz G3 iMac, and 10.2 runs
tremendously faster than 10.1.x

-Derek


On 6/5/03 8:36 AM, "jerib" <jerib at lexusofaustin.com> wrote:

> I've been a member of this list for several months now under a different
> email address that I cannot use on my work LAN (that's the reason for this
> new one).  Anyway, in all that time I've been under the impression that
> Missing-Sync was for OS X, period.  Now it comes to light we must have OS X
> 10.2 or higher.  Anything for those of us who have no use for the $130 worth
> of "enhancements" of 10.2?
> 
> Jeri B
> 
> _______________________________________________
> missing-sync-pocketpc-talk mailing list
> missing-sync-pocketpc-talk at lists.markspace.com
> Unsubcribing information, subscription options and list archives can be found
> at:
> http://lists.markspace.com/mailman/listinfo/missing-sync-pocketpc-talk
>